Popular Rockchip SBC distro in limbo after maintainer burns out
And the thing is that in all these cases, the license is the most important part for someone who's philosophical about open source or free software.
Sometimes these companies will even change their licensing.
And I think that's a pretty shady way of going about things.
If you license something free open source software with GPL or with some license that gives users freedoms, to attract developers to your ecosystem, then you start taking away those freedoms over time, that's pretty shady.
On the flip side, most of my software is either MIT or GPL licensed.