news
Review: Rhino Linux 2025.3
Quoting: DistroWatch.com: Put the fun back into computing. Use Linux, BSD. —
When comparing the two desktops, we can see that the layout and theme are very similar. The Plasma dock is mostly empty, but it expands as we add new applications and pin them. From a performance perspective, I noticed the Plasma on X11 session was faster than the Xfce session while the Plasma on Wayland session was about equal to the Xfce experience. I think Plasma's application menu might be a touch snappier and the unified menu bar/panel is a little nicer to navigate.
The new Plasma environment was a little heavier than Xfce. When I was running Xfce the distribution took up about 7GB of disk space and 640MB of RAM. When I installed the Plasma session disk usage crept up to 11GB. The Plasma X11 session required 1,000MB of RAM (360MB more than Xfce) and the Plasma Wayland session needed 1,200MB (almost twice the memory footprint of Xfce).
Despite the extra memory required, based on what I have observed, the Rhino team did a good job of duplicating their Unicorn experience from Xfce onto the Plasma desktop. From what I've seen so far I think the KDE flavour of Rhino Linux is going to prove to be popular, maybe more popular than its existing Xfce