Does The PCMag Know of Writers Experimenting With Slop Writing?
I have been doing my usual routine, that is, curating news and then I found this article, "Ubuntu 24.10 (Oracular Oriole)" - an article from PCMag. The reason I decided to run a check was my suspicion. I wanted to know whether this is truly written by a human or another example of slop. I cannot overstate how important that is; that it is because it's supposed to be a Ubuntu 24.10 review. Doing a review or writing a review about an OS should be meticulously done to convey to the reader how good, bad, etc. the OS is and also highlight any loopholes or bugs (general improvements might be suggested if needed). I wasn't even surprised with the result. Is this just a one-time experiment or has this already been tried by the writer before?