original
Linux is a Brand, Not a Philosophy
It's also a project, a kernel
In the 1980s, "hippies and rainbows" were still a thing, albeit gradually ebbing away.
Linus Torvalds was a kid in Finland. He was apparently apolitical, unlike his father.
When we say "Linux" we mean a system, which is branded "Linux". When we say "Linux application" we mean not Linux but some software which can run on the kernel Linux, typically with some userspace alongside the kernel. Some of that software can run on kernels other than Linux. To some, "Linux" is convenient shorthand for a bunch of components other than the kernel.
What unifies all those things is the brand, not a philosophy.
What is the Linux philosophy anyway?
Community? No, check who's developing Linux these days (other than opaque LLMs which obscure plagiarism).
People who seek to escape all that's wrong with Windows (or Apple's operating systems) need to focus less on brands and more on ideas.
GNU is also a brand (synonymous with Software Freedom), but there's the "GNU Project" and pertinent GNU projects (plural, small "p").
Linux is no longer synonymous with community and since Linux is developed and controlled by companies that don't pursue Software Freedom (some actively work against Software Freedom, or to generally crush users) our vocabulary should be reexamined. █
Image source: Rainbows on the Sea and on the Land