QEMU vs VirtualBox and KVM
-
QEMU vs VirtualBox: What’s the difference?
Virtualization is a helpful technology that has exploded in popularity and accessibility in the last decade. There are many great reasons to use virtual machines, such as having a test environment separate from your host operating system. It also allows you to run multiple operating systems or Linux distros simultaneously – all inside of their own sandboxed environment, with optional network interconnectivity among your machines.
When it comes to virtualization, users of Linux systems have many choices. QEMU and VirtualBox are two of the most popular hypervisors on Linux. But unless you are already familiar with virtualization and the various choices of different hypervisors, you may be wondering about the difference. In this tutorial, we will look at the differences between QEMU and VirtualBox, discuss their pros and cons, and help you decide which one is better for various virtualization needs on Linux.
-
QEMU vs KVM hypervisor: What’s the difference?
Users have a lot of choices when it comes to virtualization on a Linux system. There are many use cases for virtualization, whether you want to have a test system that is isolated from your host system, test out a different Linux distribution, or even run a completely different operating system. Whatever the case may be, you will need to have a hypervisor. A hypervisor is what manages and allows you to interact with your virtual machines.
Two popular choices on Linux are KVM and QEMU. But if you are new to virtualization on Linux, you may not yet understand the difference, or know which one is better to use. In this tutorial, we will look at QEMU vs KVM, discuss their pros and cons, and help you decide which one is better for various virtualization needs on Linux. You will also learn how the two work together to make virtualization a breeze on Linux.